And the ages assigned to the layers were derived from long age evolutionary assumptions – not from the scientific facts, – as the column was established long before we even had radiometric dating.
The resulting rock strata may harbor fossils from a particular habitat area or ecosystem, but do not represent a particular age or era.
Why else do we find marine fossils on the tops of all the major mountain ranges?
A Summary of the Million Dollar RATE Research Project (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) Introduction: Rocks and fossils do not come with dates on them.
In fact, the very concept of strata representing long ages does not come from the rock strata themselves.
How can the very top, volcanic rock be older than the very bottom layer basalt rock?
Even evolutionists admit that those Indian artifacts are not 1.3 billion years old!A 100 year sample of decay rates is inadequate when talking about millions of years. This is assumed to be immaterial, but can change the end results drastically.We do not know for sure if the rate of decay was the same 1000 years ago, let alone 10,000 years ago, or millions of years ago. Has there been contamination into the rock of either extra amounts of parent or daughter elements? 3) The starting point contains only the parent element.In geology, the buzzword is “The present is the key to the past” – but today – no 100 mile cavern systems are being formed, vitually no fossils are being formed, and no new strata covering entire continents are being laid down. Unfortunately, uniformitarianism has gripped geology academia and no other viewpoints are allowed.What we see around the earth are huge layers of sedimentary rock filled with dead things. This evolutionary assumption has become a naturalistic religion, an ideology established already before Darwin published his book in 1859.Since the early 20th century, Radioisotope dating has been used to bolster the vast time spans ascribed to the geologic record.